Political chatter from DC and NYC, the amNewYork way

Clinton's a bad choice for Dems

(Credit: Politirazzi)

Bilal's not a fan.

By Bilal

That for me would be Hillary "road to hell" Clinton. I'm an Independent with a Democrat tilt, but with Hillary as their nominee, I will distance myself from the Democrats for good.

Being against Hillary might automatically be construed as male chauvinism, but that is not true. I believe women can be leaders; I just don't see Hillary as the right candidate for the job. It may be her constant bragging of "oh, I've been there, done that" when she really has NOT or her constant distortion of facts.

Case in point her Bosnia fibs and her misquoting of Obama during the current campaign. Case in point when she claimed that Obama has said that Republicans had better ideas than Democrats in the last 10-15 years when Obama hadn't said anything of the sort.

I think Clinton has created a big questions mark over her credibility. Do you think she'd repeat this sort of behavior if she's elected President? Absolutely! This is a woman who will say anything and will do anything to get elected ... nevermind lying to the American people!

(continued) Last but not least, she must have flipped a 1,000 times on her stance on the war. Forget the past. Let's just see her latest spin. This was stated in the IOWA caucus :

“I said that we should not go to war unless we have allies. So [President Bush] took the authority that I and others gave him and he misused it, and I regret that deeply. And if we had known then what we know now, there never would have been a vote and I never would have voted to give this president that authority.”

One wonders what took such a smart woman until the Iowa contest to conclude that she had been duped and secondly, if she can be misled by so many people in whom she has confidence, how will she be able to see clearly as president?

Add new comment