SportsGiants NFL Draft: Defense seems the way Giants will go at No. 10 New York Giants general manager Jerry Reese speaks to the media during training camp at the Quest Diagnostics Training Center in East Rutherford, N.J., on Sunday, Aug. 2, 2015. Photo Credit: Brad Penner By Tom Rock email@example.com @TomRock_Newsday April 25, 2016 7:47 PM Print Share fbShare Tweet Email The biggest decision the Giants make on Thursday night when they prepare for their first-round selection in the draft won’t have much to do with who is on their board. First, they must look within. They need to decide if their quarter-of-a-billion-dollar face lift on defense so far this offseason is enough to fix the unit that floundered at the bottom of the league rankings in almost every category last year and was a large culprit in a third straight losing season, or if there are more immediate impact pieces needed to support that side of the ball. Most people believe they will go defense, where there undoubtedly will be enticing options at pass rusher, linebacker and the secondary. “Quite honestly, I don’t think there’s any chance the Giants take an offensive player,” ESPN analyst Louis Riddick, a former NFL player and front-office director, said on a conference call last week. “I just don’t see it happening, based on what has allowed them to have success in the past and what they have been deficient of in the recent past, that being pressure on the quarterback and high-level linebacker. I think that’s where their emphasis is going to be. That’s where their emphasis was in free agency, and that’s where their emphasis is going to be in this draft, particularly with that first pick.” General manager Jerry Reese suggested that the splurges of the past month and a half will have no bearing on which direction the Giants go this week. “We’re not oblivious to what we did in free agency,” he said last week, “but the draft stands alone.” The Giants have drafted defense in the first round only twice in the past seven drafts and haven’t taken any defenders there since Prince Amukamara in 2011. The expectation is that they will go against that trend this week, but there could be scenarios that alter that. So what would it take for the Giants to select an offensive player? A gift likely would have to freefall to them — picture running back Ezekiel Elliott sitting there at 10 — or the Giants either could trade back in the first round or move up with their second. Moving up could be costly, considering their need for impact players, but if Reese sees this draft as his last chance to keep his job, he might be willing to sacrifice future picks in exchange for immediate results. The Giants do have offensive needs. They have no clear No. 2 wide receiver and the right side of the offensive line could use an upgrade. They have selected an offensive lineman in the first round in two of the past three years and a lineman in either the first or second rounds in each of the last three years. That’s helped stabilize the left side, and the project could continue. Reese said he would not rule out drafting at any position. “We’re looking at it that we need help on offense, we need help on defense, we need help on special teams,” he said, “and we’re trying to get good players in every aspect of those positions.” The need, though, is on the defensive side. Barring an unexpected change in the way the draft develops, it’s a need the Giants figure to help plug on Thursday. A few offensive players the Giants could consider in the first round:Ezekiel ElliottRB, Ohio State6-foot, 225If Elliott is still around at No. 10, it could put Jerry Reese’s “best player available” philosophy to the test. The Giants don’t really need a running back, and there are many who believe that first-round picks on the position are bad investments. Yet Elliott seems to be a complete package, a game-changer. Passing him by when he has fallen into your lap could be a mistake that would haunt them for years.Ronnie StanleyTackle, Notre Dame6-5, 312Seen as more of a finesse player than a nasty run blocker, Stanley has spent the pre-draft process defending his desire and personality. Scout Nolan Nawrocki called him “a white-collar blocker at a blue-collar position” in his report. Few quibble with his technique and skill, though.Jack ConklinTackle, Michigan State6-5, 308A mauling run-blocker who played at tackle for the Spartans and could play either tackle or guard in the NFL. Scouts say he lacks the quickness for left tackle, so the Giants likely would put him on the right side, which is where they need the most help anyway.Laquon TreadwellWR, Mississippi6-2, 221It would be a reach for the Giants to take him at 10, but if they trade back, it’s a possibility. Also remember that they could trade up from the second round to get him late in the first (or earlier in the second). The Giants hit the lottery with a wide receiver from Eli Manning’s old high school (Odell Beckham Jr.). Perhaps they will try their luck with one from his college. By Tom Rock firstname.lastname@example.org @TomRock_Newsday Tom Rock began covering sports for Newsday in 1996 and has been the Giants beat writer since 2008. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Comments We're revamping our Comments section. Learn more and share your input.