Entertainment ‘Winchester’ review: Mirren’s talent wasted in horrible horror film This disaster of a movie is less interesting than watching a blank screen. Helen Mirren stars in the horror film "Winchester," which should be much better than it is. Photo Credit: Ben King By Robert Levin email@example.com @rlevin85 Updated February 5, 2018 7:20 AM Print Share fbShare Tweet gShare Email WinchesterDirected by Michael Spierig, Peter SpierigStarring Helen Mirren, Jason ClarkeRated PG-13 “Winchester” fails the most basic test in filmmaking — it is less interesting, less engaging and less enjoyable than staring at a blank screen for one hour and 39 minutes. Any movie, no matter how bad, should at least meet that smallest and most generous of standards. It’d be egregious to fail there under ordinary circumstances. But to do so when given the extra benefit of casting Helen Mirren and Jason Clarke and having a splendid horror movie premise that takes viewers inside the Winchester Mystery House ... well, that’s a special kind of abysmal. Yet here we are considering a film that should be, at worst, a diverting piece of gothic entertainment and is instead an exercise in mind-numbing tedium. The filmmakers are the Spierig Brothers — Michael and Peter — who have something of a track record when it comes to visually-driven genre cinema. They’ve made affecting stylistic diversions in the vampire movie “Daybreakers” and the sci-fi time-traveling story “Predestination.” But they’ve completely abandoned the basic principles of entertainment in “Winchester,” and the result is a haunted house movie in which the characters mostly sit and talk about hauntings in hushed, restrained tones, as a smattering of predictable jump-scares dot the landscape. Mirren plays Sarah Winchester, widow of the arms tycoon William Winchester, seen circa 1906 building room upon room in her San Jose, California, estate in perpetuity. She is compelled to do so by her belief that the many souls killed by Winchester firearms have cursed her and her family and that her only hope for safety is to trap them in the mansion. Clarke’s Dr. Eric Price is hired by the company to assess her sanity. Everything about the movie is flat — the cinematography presents the house as an abundantly ordinary collection of rooms, rather than a maze-like window into a haunted mind. The actors seem barely cognizant, coasting along for a paycheck. The scares are lazy — apparitions popping up at the most expected moments. It’s excruciating. By Robert Levin firstname.lastname@example.org @rlevin85 Robert, amNewYork's Editor-in-Chief, has been with the team in one capacity or another for more than a decade. He also reviews movies and writes entertainment features. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Comments We're revamping our Comments section. Learn more and share your input.