News ‘Right to Know’ bill loses support of key groups, including Legal Aid Society A counterpart bill, requiring police to receive audio or written consent before a search, is still viable. The 'Right to Know Act' is losing support for one of its bills, as critics claim it will ultimately create loopholes that police officers could exploit. Photo Credit: Charles Eckert By Matthew Chayes email@example.com @chayesmatthew Updated December 17, 2017 11:17 PM Print Share fbShare Tweet gShare Email City Council legislation meant to force NYPD officers to identify themselves in certain nonemergency encounters — and distribute business cards when there is no arrest or summons — is continuing to lose support from foes of police misconduct. The groups say the bill ultimately creates loopholes that cops can exploit. The Legal Aid Society, New York County Defender Services, Brooklyn Defender Services, the Bronx Defenders and Neighborhood Defender Service of Harlem are set to urge council members Monday morning to withdraw support of Introduction 182-D, which unlike an earlier version exempts the identity requirement from lower-level stops and vehicle stops. “It fails to require officer identification in the majority of police-community interactions and allows for unchecked officer discretion in determining whether to provide an explanation for any law enforcement activity,” the groups said in a written statement. But the groups are endorsing counterpart legislation, Introduction 541-C, to require NYPD cops to obtain audio or written proof of consent before searching a person absent a legal basis like a warrant. In an interview Sunday night, the sponsor of the identity bill, Councilman Ritchie Torres (D-Bronx), rejected the notion that he capitulated. No piece of legislation can solve every conceivable problem with the police, he said. “Should I sink the whole compromise based on traffic stops?” He said his bill can form the basis for future legislation to cover more kinds of police encounters. Meanwhile, the groups said, the search bill, sponsored by Councilman Antonio Reynoso, a Brooklyn Democrat, “will help to protect the rights of the people we represent against unconstitutional and coercive searches.” Last week, the New York Civil Liberties Union and Communities United for Police Reform also withdrew support for Torres’ bill. In addition, 19 families of New Yorkers killed in encounters with the police are no longer backing Torres’ bill. The withdrawn support represents an unexpected divorce between Torres and the groups, who pushed the bills for years amid opposition by Mayor Bill de Blasio and the council speaker, Melissa Mark-Viverito, who refused to allow a vote on the bills, called the Right to Know Act. Both leaders have now endorsed the new bills. Right to Know backers say more muscular legislation is necessary because people who claim police misconduct often are in the dark about who specific cops are. By Matthew Chayes firstname.lastname@example.org @chayesmatthew Matthew Chayes, a Newsday reporter since 2007, covers New York City Hall. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Comments Comments section is temporarily on hold. Here’s why.